Специфіка наративу в судовому дискурсі США
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29038/2413-0923-2021-14-46-60Ключові слова:
судовий дискурс, наратив, специфічні ознаки, комунікативні стратегії, стратагеми, соціологемиАнотація
Стаття присвячена виявленню специфічних ознак наративу в дискурсі змагальної судової системи. Показано, що в судовому наративі виокремлюються константні і змінні ознаки, обґрунтовано їхні характеристики. Доведено, що зміст наративу та комунікативні стратегії, тактики, ходи відрізняються у обвинувачів і адвокатів: основною специфічною ознакою наративу обвинувачів є синкретизм функцій наративу і персуазиву, а адвокатів – синкретизм функцій наративу, персуазиву та рефутативу.
Посилання
Sources
Harper, Lee. To kill a mockingbird. Москва: Антология, 2016.
Opening Statements. The Amadou Diallo Trial. criminaldefense.homestead.com/ diallo/htm.
The Diallo Verdict. www.nytimes.com/2000/02/26/nyregion/diallo-verdict-overview-4-officers-diallo-shooting-are- acquitted-all-charges.html.
Devil's Advocate. gidonline.io/film/advokat-dyavola/.
Find Me Guilty. https://cutt.ly/znrqnvj.
References
Bystrov, Yakiv. Anhlomovnyi biohrafichnyi naratyv u vymirakh kohnityvnoi linhvistyky i synerhetyky. Ivano-Frankivsk, 2016.
Voevodin, Aleksej. Stratagemy. Strategii vojny, manipuljacii, obmana. Moskva: Belye al’vy, 2003.
Georgievskaya, K. “Linguistic features of English Legal Discourse”. Writings in Romance-Germanic Philology, no 2 (43), 2019, pp. 103–8. https://doi.org/10.18524/2307-4604.2019.2(43).186237
Dijk, Teun Adrianus Van. Jazyk. Poznanie. Kommunikacija. Moscow, 1989.
Diomidova, Olena. Evoliutsiia movnoho dyskursu v sudovykh promovakh vydatnykh yurystiv ХІХ–ХХ st. Kharkiv: “Drukarnia Madryd”, 2015.
Dotsenko, Olena. “Genre Specificity of Ukrainian Court Discourse”. Linguistic and Conceptual Views of the World, iss. 24, part 1, Kyiv, 2008, pp. 269–80.
Zaitseva, Margaryta, and Lypko, Iryna. “Specificity of Language Means and Organization of the Semantic Space of the Suggestive Discourse”. Journal of the National Technical University of Ukraine “KPI”: Philology and Educational Studies, no. 10, 2017, pp. 26–30.
Karasik, Vladimir. “O tipah diskursa”. Jazykovaja lichnost': institucional'nyj i personal'nyj diskurs. Volgograd: Peremena, 2000, pp. 5–20.
Kobzieva, Olena. Judge’s Strategies and Tactics in American Courtroom Discource. PhD Thesis. Kharkiv, 2017.
Kukovska, Viktoria. “Judicial Speech: an Explicative Narrative or a Hidden Dialogue?” Mova, no. 27, 2017, pp. 30-4. https://doi.org/10.18524/2307-4558.2017.27.107887.
Lysanets, Yuliia. “Medical Narrative as a Linguistic Category”. Scientific jornal of the Lviv State University of Life Safety “Philological Periodical of Lviv”, no. 3, 2018, pp. 145-8.
Lingvisticheskij jenciklopedicheskij slovar', edited by V. N. Jarceva. Moscow: Sovetskaja jenciklopedija, 1990.
Literaturnyy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar. edited by V. M. Kozhevnikov, P. A. Nikolayev. Moscow: Sovetskaja jenciklopedija, 1987.
Minchenko, Olga. Zahalnoteoretychni ta metodolohichni zasady systemy yurydyko-linhvistychnykh znan. Kyiv, 2019.
Mozhejko, M. Narrativ. Istorija filosofii. Jenciklopedija. Minsk: Interpresservis; Knizhnyj Dom, 2002, s. 650–2.
Palashevskaja, Irina. Sudebnyj diskurs: funkcii, struktura, narrativnost'. Doctoral Thesis. Volgograd, 2012.
Pelepeychenko, Liudmyla. “Conditions of Implementing the Impact Potential of the Narrative in Social Communications”. Scientific notes of V. I. Vernadsky Taurida National University. Series: Philology. Journalism, vol. 31 (70), no. 1, part. 3, 2020, pp. 46-51.
Pradid, Yurii. “Juridical Linguistics in Ukraine: Achievements and Perspectives”. Movoznavstvo, no. 2, 2011, pp. 31-7.
Tsareva, Iryna. “Lingualpragmatic Aspect of the Legal Text Study”. Bulletin Zaporizhzhia national university. Philological sciences, no. 1, 2019, pp. 78–80. https://doi.org/10.26661/2414-9594-2019-1-17.
Burns, Robert. A theory of the trial. cutt.ly/pbAwM7z.
Cotterill, Janet. Language and Power in Court. cutt.ly/SbAefrb.
Griffin, Lisa. “Narrative, Truth, and Trial”. The Georgetown Law Journal, vol. 101, 2013, pp. 281-335. URL: https://cutt.ly/AbAenej.
Herman, David. Basic elements of narrative. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/ 9781444305920.
Schiff, Brian. A New Narrative for Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/ 9780199332182.001.0001
Harper, Lee. To kill a mockingbird. Москва: Антология, 2016.
Opening Statements. The Amadou Diallo Trial. criminaldefense.homestead.com/ diallo/htm.
The Diallo Verdict. www.nytimes.com/2000/02/26/nyregion/diallo-verdict-overview-4-officers-diallo-shooting-are- acquitted-all-charges.html.
Devil's Advocate. gidonline.io/film/advokat-dyavola/.
Find Me Guilty. https://cutt.ly/znrqnvj.
References
Bystrov, Yakiv. Anhlomovnyi biohrafichnyi naratyv u vymirakh kohnityvnoi linhvistyky i synerhetyky. Ivano-Frankivsk, 2016.
Voevodin, Aleksej. Stratagemy. Strategii vojny, manipuljacii, obmana. Moskva: Belye al’vy, 2003.
Georgievskaya, K. “Linguistic features of English Legal Discourse”. Writings in Romance-Germanic Philology, no 2 (43), 2019, pp. 103–8. https://doi.org/10.18524/2307-4604.2019.2(43).186237
Dijk, Teun Adrianus Van. Jazyk. Poznanie. Kommunikacija. Moscow, 1989.
Diomidova, Olena. Evoliutsiia movnoho dyskursu v sudovykh promovakh vydatnykh yurystiv ХІХ–ХХ st. Kharkiv: “Drukarnia Madryd”, 2015.
Dotsenko, Olena. “Genre Specificity of Ukrainian Court Discourse”. Linguistic and Conceptual Views of the World, iss. 24, part 1, Kyiv, 2008, pp. 269–80.
Zaitseva, Margaryta, and Lypko, Iryna. “Specificity of Language Means and Organization of the Semantic Space of the Suggestive Discourse”. Journal of the National Technical University of Ukraine “KPI”: Philology and Educational Studies, no. 10, 2017, pp. 26–30.
Karasik, Vladimir. “O tipah diskursa”. Jazykovaja lichnost': institucional'nyj i personal'nyj diskurs. Volgograd: Peremena, 2000, pp. 5–20.
Kobzieva, Olena. Judge’s Strategies and Tactics in American Courtroom Discource. PhD Thesis. Kharkiv, 2017.
Kukovska, Viktoria. “Judicial Speech: an Explicative Narrative or a Hidden Dialogue?” Mova, no. 27, 2017, pp. 30-4. https://doi.org/10.18524/2307-4558.2017.27.107887.
Lysanets, Yuliia. “Medical Narrative as a Linguistic Category”. Scientific jornal of the Lviv State University of Life Safety “Philological Periodical of Lviv”, no. 3, 2018, pp. 145-8.
Lingvisticheskij jenciklopedicheskij slovar', edited by V. N. Jarceva. Moscow: Sovetskaja jenciklopedija, 1990.
Literaturnyy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar. edited by V. M. Kozhevnikov, P. A. Nikolayev. Moscow: Sovetskaja jenciklopedija, 1987.
Minchenko, Olga. Zahalnoteoretychni ta metodolohichni zasady systemy yurydyko-linhvistychnykh znan. Kyiv, 2019.
Mozhejko, M. Narrativ. Istorija filosofii. Jenciklopedija. Minsk: Interpresservis; Knizhnyj Dom, 2002, s. 650–2.
Palashevskaja, Irina. Sudebnyj diskurs: funkcii, struktura, narrativnost'. Doctoral Thesis. Volgograd, 2012.
Pelepeychenko, Liudmyla. “Conditions of Implementing the Impact Potential of the Narrative in Social Communications”. Scientific notes of V. I. Vernadsky Taurida National University. Series: Philology. Journalism, vol. 31 (70), no. 1, part. 3, 2020, pp. 46-51.
Pradid, Yurii. “Juridical Linguistics in Ukraine: Achievements and Perspectives”. Movoznavstvo, no. 2, 2011, pp. 31-7.
Tsareva, Iryna. “Lingualpragmatic Aspect of the Legal Text Study”. Bulletin Zaporizhzhia national university. Philological sciences, no. 1, 2019, pp. 78–80. https://doi.org/10.26661/2414-9594-2019-1-17.
Burns, Robert. A theory of the trial. cutt.ly/pbAwM7z.
Cotterill, Janet. Language and Power in Court. cutt.ly/SbAefrb.
Griffin, Lisa. “Narrative, Truth, and Trial”. The Georgetown Law Journal, vol. 101, 2013, pp. 281-335. URL: https://cutt.ly/AbAenej.
Herman, David. Basic elements of narrative. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/ 9781444305920.
Schiff, Brian. A New Narrative for Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/ 9780199332182.001.0001
Завантаження
Опубліковано
2021-06-25
Номер
Розділ
Статті
Як цитувати
“Специфіка наративу в судовому дискурсі США”. Лінгвостилістичні студії, no. 14, June 2021, pp. 46-60, https://doi.org/10.29038/2413-0923-2021-14-46-60.
